Elevate your local knowledge
Sign up for the iNFOnews newsletter today!
Elevate your local knowledge
Sign up for the iNFOnews newsletter today!
Select Region
Selecting your primary region ensures you get the stories that matter to you first.
WINNIPEG – The future of an inquiry into a Manitoba judge may hang on one question —can the panel overseeing the case also grill witnesses under cross-examination?
The issue could derail the inquiry into Lori Douglas, a Manitoba judge whose husband uploaded sexually explicit photos of her to the Internet.
The inquiry by the Canadian Judicial Council is being conducted by a five-member panel, including the chief justices of three provinces.
Douglas’s lawyer is upset that the panel has had its own lawyer aggressively cross-examine witnesses, and says it has shown signs of bias against Douglas.
Douglas’s lawyer is now asking the Federal Court of Canada to quash the inquiry.
In documents released today, the inquiry panel says it has both a right and a duty to ask questions, in order to get to the truth.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Want to share your thoughts, add context, or connect with others in your community?
You must be logged in to post a comment.